Author Topic: Observations on superbowl 52  (Read 1258 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ZACH

  • Administrator
  • Diamond
  • Posts: 10331
  • Total likes: 909
  • Coaching: 12 & Under
  • Defense: 10-1
  • Offense: One Back
  • Title: Head Coach
Observations on superbowl 52
« on: February 05, 2018, 09:49:14 AM »
Eagles
- ran the mesh concept so many different ways and were succesful at least 70% of the time.
- few choice concepts
- a lot china concepts

Pats
- choice routes + double moves

The pats had 600+ total yards of offense resembling a lot of rns similarities of mouse.

Very fun game to watch, any one else notice or saw anything you liked
"Some athletes have division 1 dreams and jv work ethic" - random

Offline mahonz

  • Administrator
  • Kryptonite
  • Posts: 24126
  • Total likes: 2458
  • No Wimps
  • Coaching: 7 & Under
  • Defense: DC 46
  • Offense: Single Wing
  • Title: Head Coach
Re: Observations on superbowl 52
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2018, 10:21:25 AM »
If you can RPO Bellichick to death without a running QB threat....imagine the possibility when an NFL team actually stops paying average pocket QB's $100M and starts platooning them as passing RB's.

Gronk is a beast. 

Peterson has balls the size of Texas.

Brady looked very slow.

Who brought that stooopid Foxborough Fog Horn to the game?

Pink missed her big note.

Will Wentz start next Fall?

Will Bellichick retire?

I think I gained 10 pounds.
Collect moments, not wins.

Offline gumby_in_co

  • Administrator
  • Gold
  • Posts: 3920
  • Total likes: 1365
  • Coaching: 7 & Under
  • Defense: 46
  • Offense: Other
  • Title: Positions
Re: Observations on superbowl 52
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2018, 10:37:22 AM »
imagine the possibility when an NFL team actually stops paying average pocket QB's $100M and starts platooning them as passing RB's.


Been saying that since Tebow was a Bronco. Why no option in pro football? QBs are too valuable. Why are there so few pocket QBs? Every college team runs option. Solve two problems at once. Bring in 3 option QBs and rotate them. Tebow might still be in the game.

The cupboard was bare for the Pats. Too much to overcome, especially on defense.
Both teams had the types of o-line that illustrates how much trouble the Broncos are in. Kirk Cousins would be insane to come here.
Philly is a damned good team. When Blount is your 3rd RB,  you're pretty dang good.
Head shots have GOT to stop. Too easy to put a guy out of the game(s) and it takes no skill or courage to do it. If you injure a guy with a head shot, you are out as long as he is.
Mission Statement: To create a Football Family that our players and parents can't imagine not being a part of.

Offline ZACH

  • Administrator
  • Diamond
  • Posts: 10331
  • Total likes: 909
  • Coaching: 12 & Under
  • Defense: 10-1
  • Offense: One Back
  • Title: Head Coach
Re: Observations on superbowl 52
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2018, 10:45:19 AM »
Wentz will start, foles gets traded for high 1st round pick.

"Some athletes have division 1 dreams and jv work ethic" - random

Offline Michael

  • Diamond
  • Posts: 14277
  • Total likes: 2842
  • Coaching: 13 & Under
  • Defense: Undecided
  • Offense: One Back
  • Title: Assistant
Re: Observations on superbowl 52
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2018, 10:49:44 AM »
I thought the Eagles secondary really tackled well.
Michael can not receive PM's, emails or respond to Posts. He passed away in September 2018. To honor his contributions we are leaving his account active. R.I.P - Dumcoach Staff.

Offline Test Account

  • Platinum
  • Posts: 8625
  • Total likes: 3
  • Admin Dead Account
  • Coaching: 6 & Under
  • Defense: Undecided
  • Offense: Undecided
  • Title: Other
Re: Observations on superbowl 52
« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2018, 11:30:27 AM »
....imagine the possibility when an NFL team actually stops paying average pocket QB's $100M and starts platooning them as passing RB's.

Ha ha Ha Ha!!!!! ROLMAO! Dream on!
Please don't PM or respond to this Member. It is an account for all of the posts from abandoned or banned Member Accounts.

Offline bignose

  • Bronze
  • Posts: 893
  • Total likes: 226
  • Coaching: High School
  • Defense: 3-5-3
  • Offense: Other
  • Title: Retired
Re: Observations on superbowl 52
« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2018, 11:50:04 AM »
Were there any offensive holding penalties?
Hard to believe that there weren't.

Defensive pass interference?
Nah, a couple of defensive holdings, that's about it.

Pretty obvious that the officials just let them play. Which is a good thing, and it is one of the reasons there was as much offense as there was.

Gotta get that pass completion rule cleaned up.
You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles!

Offline Test Account

  • Platinum
  • Posts: 8625
  • Total likes: 3
  • Admin Dead Account
  • Coaching: 6 & Under
  • Defense: Undecided
  • Offense: Undecided
  • Title: Other
Re: Observations on superbowl 52
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2018, 12:44:47 PM »
Eagles
- ran the mesh concept so many different ways and were succesful at least 70% of the time.
- few choice concepts
- a lot china concepts

Pats
- choice routes + double moves

The pats had 600+ total yards of offense resembling a lot of rns similarities of mouse.

Very fun game to watch, any one else notice or saw anything you liked
I have to watch for the mesh alone!
Please don't PM or respond to this Member. It is an account for all of the posts from abandoned or banned Member Accounts.

Offline mpwcoachsmith

  • Copper
  • Posts: 248
  • Total likes: 36
  • Coaching: 11 & Under
  • Defense: Killer Bee
  • Offense: Single Wing
  • Title: Head Coach
Re: Observations on superbowl 52
« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2018, 01:45:14 PM »
I thought the eagles o-line were crushing pats in first half.

Offline morris

  • Gold
  • Posts: 2925
  • Total likes: 156
  • Coaching: Middle School
  • Defense: DC 46
  • Offense: Undecided
  • Title: Other
Re: Observations on superbowl 52
« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2018, 10:31:30 PM »
The Eagles ran the Martz/Kelly version of Mesh that has become very popular. Ohio St ran it a ton too.

The Eagles didn’t RPO that much. A ton of what they called RPO was just PAP.

What is China? Triangle read like Snag?

Offline mahonz

  • Administrator
  • Kryptonite
  • Posts: 24126
  • Total likes: 2458
  • No Wimps
  • Coaching: 7 & Under
  • Defense: DC 46
  • Offense: Single Wing
  • Title: Head Coach
Re: Observations on superbowl 52
« Reply #10 on: February 05, 2018, 11:22:49 PM »


The Eagles didn’t RPO that much. A ton of what they called RPO was just PAP.


J

I was thinking the same thing so I started watch the receivers. They were running routes most every snap so the intent was there. Bellichick just got his ass handed to him for 4 Q's by an RPO look that didn't use the QB as a running threat. Imagine the possibilities if an NFL team were to add a running QB. Say the QB keeps every 12-15th snap would be enough to hold the Defense. Just scratch out 5 yards and get down....live to run another down.
Collect moments, not wins.

Offline Dusty Ol Fart

  • Platinum
  • Posts: 7492
  • Total likes: 864
  • Coaching: 12 & Under
  • Defense: 6-3
  • Offense: Spread Formation
  • Title: Retired
Re: Observations on superbowl 52
« Reply #11 on: February 06, 2018, 07:34:57 AM »
Just under 95 passes thrown between 2 teams.  My opinion?  This was Mid America Conference (MAC) Game.  I believe these defenses were in the top 10 this year?  Looked more like a 7 on 7 to me.  Essentially you either stop the last play of the game or you lose.  "The Catch" rule needs to go away. 
Not MPP... ONE TASK!  Teach them!  :)

Offline morris

  • Gold
  • Posts: 2925
  • Total likes: 156
  • Coaching: Middle School
  • Defense: DC 46
  • Offense: Undecided
  • Title: Other
Re: Observations on superbowl 52
« Reply #12 on: February 06, 2018, 06:30:33 PM »
You can tell if it’s RPO by the OL. WR will lie to you all day but the OL in the end have to tell you the truth.  Collinsworth was getting blasted for not knowing the difference.